MI5, Murdoch and The Lady – all very odd

Dame Stella Rimington has revealed that she was spied upon by Rupert Murdoch’s Sunday Times while she was head of MI5 (1992-96). They snooped into her private life – her shopping, her banking and even her medical records.

This story takes the News International scandal into a new zone. This time, we are not talking about tabloid phone-hacking. We are talking about a Murdoch broadsheet, The Sunday Times, and spying – or “blagging” – into the life of the head of Britain’s secret services. While the facts they were seeking may have been personal, there were still major national security implications and the public are entitled to know what went on.

Curiously, the story came to light in an interview Stella Rimington gave to The Lady, the most genteel of genteel magazines. And, strangely, the magazine published this sensational news with no fanfare whatsoever. Is that because it failed to recognise its significance or is there some other reason?

Now The Lady is not as stuck in the past as some people might think. Under the savvy editorship of Rachel Johnson, it has been given a new lease of life and gained in reputation. How could Ms Johnson not have realized the importance of what Stella Remington was saying? (A cynic might wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that Murdoch’s tablet Daily, newly arrived in the UK, is advertised on The Lady’s website. An even greater cynic, might wonder if Rachel is disinclined to upset too many Murdoch papers while her brother is seeking re-election as Mayor of London.) But perhaps we are being unfair. The stories about the behaviour of News International are so numerous and shocking, we are all getting a little punch drunk. And, at the end of the day, we owe Ms Johnson and her magazine our gratitude for bringing the matter to light.

As for the manner of Stella Rimington’s revelations, this is even more puzzling. One assumes that, as head of MI5, she reported her suspicions at the time. If so, were they investigated and what was the conclusion? Will we ever know? If she has said nothing until now, why has she kept quiet for so long? And why, of all publications, did she choose The Lady? Was she being deliberately low key or did she herself not recognize the significance of what she was saying?

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/273297/Rupert-Murdoch-staff-spied-on-me-says-MI5-boss

Advertisements

One response to “MI5, Murdoch and The Lady – all very odd

  1. Dame Stella has spoken before about two journalists who came to her front door and asked her point blank whether she was in charge of MI5.They might have been from the New Statesman, but this revealtaion that she was spied on by the Murdoch press, not the Sun ot the NoW but the Times is very, very sinister indeed. It also points out the fact that these immoral techniques used by the group have been unused for many a year.

    In her relatively unrevealing autobiography Rimington reveals that planning meetings used to be held in her dining room in Alwyne Road Canonbury, not as you would think in some secure bunker under the Millbank HQ of MI5. She also accidentally revealed on a very careful reading exactly where she had previously lived in Canonbuty Grove.

    I have taken the trouble to write to Operation Weeting to see if my phone has been attacked, and have received confirmation that is has not, and looking at my sort of phone usage and the techniques used by Murdoch, which attack only the voicemail, I think it is unlikely they would learn anything interesting from me.

    But if a woman like Rimingtion is as vulnerable as this story seems to suggest, why could she not do something about it, after all MI5 works hand in hand with Special Branch.

    It also suggests that there is a need for much better secure voicemail packages, perhaps computer based voicemail machines, which if mounted on ecure Linux pltforms would be unhackable.

    Perhaps there is a story for us here. If i their private lives people like Rimington are as vulnerable as the rest of us, we should begin to take the matter of our safety and security that much more seriously.

    For, if using rather primitive techniques alavishly, just think what the Russians, Chinese, French of the Americans can do to our secrets.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s